PDA

View Full Version : Most Ironic Article Title Evar...


BizarroCub
2005-01-19, 07:20 PM
Poll: Nation split on Bush as uniter or divider
Most say inauguration festivities should be toned down

Wednesday, January 19, 2005 Posted: 4:19 PM EST (2119 GMT)

(CNN) -- On the eve of President Bush's inauguration, a poll shows the nation is split over whether he has united or divided the nation, but a majority believe his inauguration festivities should be toned down because of the war.

During the 2000 campaign, Bush promised to be a "uniter, not a divider."

Forty-nine percent of 1,007 adult Americans said in phone interviews they believe Bush is a "uniter," according to the CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll released Wednesday. Another 49 percent called him a "divider," and 2 percent had no opinion.

The results nearly match those of a poll taken in October 2004, which showed 48 percent considered Bush a "uniter" and 48 percent called him a "divider," with 4 percent having no opinion. (Full story)

Bush's inauguration was viewed by 69 percent, more than two-thirds of respondents, as a celebration by the winning presidential candidate's supporters rather than a celebration of democracy by all Americans, as 29 percent saw it. Two percent had no opinion.

And 79 percent of poll respondents said they believe the inauguration ceremony will not do much to heal political divisions in the country. Eighteen percent said it would, and 3 percent had no opinion.

Also, 54 percent said the celebration should be toned down this year, compared with other inaugurations, because the country is at war. Forty-five percent said the inauguration should be held just as in other years, and 1 percent had no opinion.

Sixty-one percent of respondents said they believe protests during the inaugural celebration would be inappropriate, regardless of whether they believed people had a right to protest. When the same question was asked in January 2001, 71 percent said protests are inappropriate.

Asked about the president's most important role, 34 percent of respondents said it should be to manage the federal government and 24 percent said it should be to provide moral leadership.

Another 20 percent said it is acting as commander in chief of the military, up from 9 percent in a poll taken eight months before the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

The telephone poll was conducted Friday through Sunday. It has a 95 percent confidence rate, and the margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points.

DeAtHmOnGeR bEaR
2005-01-19, 07:22 PM
I honestly think he could have toned down his festivities and not been any the worse for wear.

zartan
2005-01-19, 07:48 PM
here's why they're not: because of how much money all the people being rewarded during the inauguration spent on his campaign. thats what this is about - rewarding the bush "rangers" and "pioneers".

zartan
2005-01-19, 07:49 PM
give bush ten grand, get to shake his hand at the capital hilton.

Bavarias_Finest
2005-01-20, 01:23 AM
give bush ten grand, get to shake his hand at the capital hilton.

....and that is not the case with the majority of the past presidents :wtf:

Its unfortunately how American politics have worked since the turn of the 20th century, and have continued to work, like it or hate it, want Bush to die or not .... thats how it all works, money is pervasive in Washington D.C. and all the state capitols .... its the reality

zartan
2005-01-20, 11:11 AM
oh, absolutely. this is why i supported howard dean.

Light Touch
2005-01-20, 11:12 AM
I'm curious to hear what true conservatives really think about this use of federal funds.

It's despicable, IMHO.

uberclkgtr
2005-01-20, 11:59 AM
:afterbuzz:

i love the irony of that headline. sounds like it's from the onion.

BizarroCub
2005-01-20, 12:03 PM
I'm curious to hear what true conservatives really think about this use of federal funds.

It's despicable, IMHO.

Yeah...I always love it when assholes waist my tax money to gloat and to punish the folks that didn't vote for you, i.e. the DC taxpayer.

mattb
2005-01-20, 12:06 PM
It doesn't have to be that way. If we as a nation were to decide once and for all to end the monetary patronage system that motivates individuals in public service, I feel as though our nation would benefit greatly. I can envision a better way.


....and that is not the case with the majority of the past presidents :wtf:

Its unfortunately how American politics have worked since the turn of the 20th century, and have continued to work, like it or hate it, want Bush to die or not .... thats how it all works, money is pervasive in Washington D.C. and all the state capitols .... its the reality

BizarroCub
2005-01-20, 12:09 PM
....and that is not the case with the majority of the past presidents :wtf:

Its unfortunately how American politics have worked since the turn of the 20th century, and have continued to work, like it or hate it, want Bush to die or not .... thats how it all works, money is pervasive in Washington D.C. and all the state capitols .... its the reality

You might note also that this is the first or one of the first times EVER that a President has stiffed DC and it's taxpayers with the bill. He the first war time president NOT to tone down his innaguration and this is the most expensive one ever.

This is most certainly NOT business as usual.

mattb
2005-01-20, 12:09 PM
Yeah no shit, we need that money for the baseball stadium.


Yeah...I always love it when assholes waist my tax money to gloat and to punish the folks that didn't vote for you, i.e. the DC taxpayer.

evey
2005-01-20, 12:14 PM
And to pay Sammy Sosa's salary if the Nationals trade for him!