PDA

View Full Version : can anyone anwser this 9-11 question?


superkool
2003-07-04, 06:19 AM
Autopsy: No Arabs on Flight 77
By Thomas R. Olmsted, M.D

I am an ex Naval line officer and a psychiatrist in private practice in New Orleans, a Christian and homeschool dad. It troubled me a great deal that we rushed off to war on the flimsiest of evidence. I considered various ways to provide a smoking gun of who and why Sept 11th happened. Astute observers noticed right away that there were no Arabic sounding names on any of the flight manifests of the planes that “crashed” on that day. FOIA Cover Page

Click on Image for Full Size Graphic
A list of names on a piece of paper is not evidence, but an autopsy by a pathologist, is. I undertook by FOIA request, to obtain that autopsy list and you are invited to view it below. Guess what? Still no Arabs on the list. It is my opinion that the monsters who planned this crime made a mistake by not including Arabic names on the original list to make the ruse seem more believable.

When airline disasters occur, airlines will routinely provide a manifest list for anxious families. You may have noticed that even before Sep 11th, that airlines are pretty meticulous about getting an accurate headcount before takeoff. It seems very unlikely to me, that five Arabs sneaked onto a flight with weapons.
This is the list provided by American of the 56 passengers:


On September 27th, the FBI published photos of the “hijackers” of Flight 77:


Meanwhile, back at the ranch, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP), does a miraculous job and identified nearly all the bodies on November 16th 2001.


Official Autopsy List - Page 2

Click on Image for Full Size Graphic
The AFIP suggest these numbers; 189 killed, 125 worked at the Pentagon and 64 were “passengers” on the plane. The AA list only had 56 and the list just obtained has 58. They did not explain how they were able to tell “victims” bodies from “hijacker” bodies. In fact, from the beginning NO explanation has been given for the extra five suggested in news reports except that the FBI showed us the pictures to make up the difference, and that makes it so.



Now, being the trusting sort, I figured that the government would want to quickly dispel any rumors so we could get on with the chore of kicking Osama/Sadaam’s butt (weren’t these originally two different people?). It seemed simple to me. . .produce the names of all the bodies identified by the AFIP and compare it with the publicized list of passengers. So, I sent a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the AFIP and asked for an expedited response, because we were getting ready to send our boys to war on the pretext that Osama/Sadaam had done the deed. Fourteen months later, a few US soldiers dead, many Iraqi civilians pushing up daisies, and I finally get the list. Believe me that they weren’t a bit happy to give it up, and I really have no idea why they choose now to release it.

Official Autopsy List - Page 2

Click on Image for Full Size Graphic
No Arabs wound up on the morgue slab; however, three ADDITIONAL people not listed by American Airline sneaked in. I have seen no explanation for these extras. I did give American the opportunity to “revise” their original list, but they have not responded. The new names are: Robert Ploger, Zandra Ploger, and Sandra Teague. The AFIP claims that the only “passenger” body that they were not able to identify is the toddler, Dana Falkenberg, whose parents and young sister are on the list of those identified. The satanic masterminds behind this caper may be feeling pretty smug about the perfect crime, but they have left a raft of clues tying these unfortunates together. Stay tuned for part two to take a much closer look of the cast of characters on this ill-fated flight.




http://www.sierratimes.com/03/07/02/article_tro.htm

Buddafly
2003-07-04, 06:53 AM
supertool? sorry, I had to!

designer
2004-07-16, 05:46 PM
It seems that filmmaker Larry Clark can’t get out of bed without causing controversy. Leaving various moral groups and the Daily Mail brigade up in arms with his bleak, often explicit films, he has become notorious for the kind of risk taking film-making that will have moral activist Mary Whitehouse turning in her coffin.

designer
2004-07-16, 05:47 PM
In November 2002, Tartan films decided to drop his latest celluloid effort ‘Ken Park’ after Clark reportedly hit the company’s chairman Hamish McAlpine, following a debate on the September 11th attacks. The film, which like two of Clark’s other most famous pictures, ‘Kids’ and ‘Bully’, focuses on the everyday lives and troubles of a group of down and out American teenagers. For over a year the film remained dormant with no distribution company willing to pick up where Tartan left off. Finally, at the end of last year ‘Park managed to find three suitable distributors, with a final suitor soon to be decided.

designer
2004-07-16, 05:47 PM
The film hasn’t had an easy ride in the US either, where it has had trouble finding a distributor, even though it played at many of the 2002 festivals including Toronto and Telluride. It was finally picked up by Vitagraph, an arm of American Cinemateque and was released unrated in August of last year to selected cinemas, with much of the initial controversy now faded. The film wasn’t given an official rating by the MPAA, however, with the board citing it’s excessive explicit sexual scenes as the reason for it being denied anything less than an NC-17 rating, which would have included cuts. This meant that it could still be shown but few movie theaters, besides arthouses would touch it. Talks are currently under way to grant the film an official U.S. release; whether the film will escape the censors as Clark intends is questionable. He said in an Australian interview in defence of the film that “I’m making a social comment”. He then added, “This is about real people, right now”.

bboyneko
2004-07-16, 05:48 PM
there are lotws of weird unanswered questions about 9-11, including the israelis reported by foxnews to be seen celebrating on a rooftop shortly after the plane crashed into tower 1, or the report about an israeli owned communications company receving an email urging them to evacuate the building just a few hours before plane 1 crashed.

evey
2004-07-16, 05:50 PM
supertool? sorry, I had to!

:haha:

Oops!